Sources |
- [S22] The Complete Peerage, G. E. Cokayne, with Vicary Gibbs, H.A. Doubleday, Geoffrey H. White, Duncan Warrand and Lord Howard de Walden (eds.), (Alan Sutton Publishing, 1910–59; reprint in 6 volumes, Gloucester, 2000), volume XII/2, page 693.
- [S22] The Complete Peerage, G. E. Cokayne, with Vicary Gibbs, H.A. Doubleday, Geoffrey H. White, Duncan Warrand and Lord Howard de Walden (eds.), (Alan Sutton Publishing, 1910–59; reprint in 6 volumes, Gloucester, 2000), volume XII/2, page 693.
The case is fully discussed by H. A. Doubleday in Complete Peerage, volume IV, Appendix H, pages 742–44; cf. Collins, Proceedings and Precedents, pages 321–31; Round, Peerage and Pedigree, volume i, pages 220–21, 224–26; and, for a précis of the proceedings, Hist. MSS. Com., House of Lords MSS., N.S., volume i, pages 403–10. During the hearing of the claim a resolution was carried in the House of Lords, 19 March 1694/95, affirming the right of a surviving coheir of a Barony by writ to demand a summons to Parliament, which decision finally settled one of the most obscure questions regarding the modern doctrine of abeyance. See Doubleday, loc. cit., where, however, (page 743, note "a") the date of the resolution should be as above; cf. Lords' Journal, volume xv, page 522.
- [S22] The Complete Peerage, G. E. Cokayne, with Vicary Gibbs, H.A. Doubleday, Geoffrey H. White, Duncan Warrand and Lord Howard de Walden (eds.), (Alan Sutton Publishing, 1910–59; reprint in 6 volumes, Gloucester, 2000), volume XII/2, page 694.
- [S22] The Complete Peerage, G. E. Cokayne, with Vicary Gibbs, H.A. Doubleday, Geoffrey H. White, Duncan Warrand and Lord Howard de Walden (eds.), (Alan Sutton Publishing, 1910–59; reprint in 6 volumes, Gloucester, 2000), volume XII/2, page 692.
- [S2] BP 2003, Charles Mosley (ed.), (Wilmington, Delaware, U.S.A.: Burke's Peerage (Genealogical Books) Ltd., 2003), volume 3, page 4192.
|